I’m always curious as to why Bruce has ended up with this tough-guy-hero image. He’s great in Die Hard, but what has he done to maintain it since? Die Hard 2? Rubbish. Die Hard 3? Originally scripted to be a Lethal Weapon film (true story) and it reeks of it. Die Hard 4? Not bad, but still not perfect. Other than that?
Okay, he’s been in a few great films – Pulp Fiction and Twelve Monkeys come to mind, but I can’t think of anything else that’s anywhere close to classic status – so why is he supposed to be this big action hero? He’s nowhere near his Planet Hollywood buddies. With Stallone, you get Rocky and First Blood – both perfect – and that’s before you get to anything else (like the excellent Copland, and err...Stop! Or My Mom Will Shoot). Schwarzenegger has a number of films that hit the spot – the first two Terminators go without saying, and there are a number of films (Total Recall, True Lies, Predator) that match anything from Bruce’s oeuvre. So why is Bruce supposed to be a hard man? He’s the cinematic equivalent of Danny Dyer. Only balder, 20 years older and less cockney.
Anyway, back to Surrogates. The first act is crazy – all the cast walk around in shiny make-up (and in Bruce’s case, one of the worst wigs this side of Norma Bates) – which, with the less-than-muted colour palette and neon lighting, make it eerily reminiscent of late 80s action flicks. There hasn’t been a murder in umpteen years, because everybody’s so happy living inside their robotic avatars, but what’s this? Aha, it’s a good old-fashioned murder. Somebody’s fried the eyes out of James Cromwell’s son, and Brucie’s on the case.
Surrogates could be a decent film. With a different director, and maybe a leading man who isn’t restricted to one facial expression (I like to call Bruce’s look “bewildered glow”), but at the end of the day, the concept is too big for the film to handle, especially with its 88 minute running time.
Try again Bruce.

